Did Modi take part in Gujarat massacre?

In the past few years, very few Indian politicians have been trashed or have won accolades as much as Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi. Clearly, he is one of the most controversial persons in India. A lot has been written against Modi and his handling of the post-Godhra scenario. He has also been called the modern-day Hitler. But there is another side as well: it is also said there is no better performer than Narendra Modi in India’s political structure. In fact, Gujarat’s achievements in the past few years are often attributed to the efforts made by him.

Anyway, we are not here to decide whether we should side with someone who abuses him or those who heap praises on him, for that matter. We won’t conclude whether things that are said about him are true or not. Here, we will just analyse Modi’s signature. Here are a few points I have to share with you about his signature.

Illegible signature: If we do not have Narendra Modi’s full name written under his signature, is there any way we can figured out it is his handwriting sample? Nope. In graphology, such signatures are called illegible. A legible signature means the writer is interested in communicating; an illegible one means the opposite. In general, an illegible signature reveals a desire to be seen, but not known. Illegible handwriting, in combination with other specific traits, may usually indicate the writer’s dishonesty. However, there are a lot of variables.

Lack of readability: If all letters in a signature are readable,  the writer’s feelings are readable. Even if a legible writer tries to dissemble his feelings, he usually faces failure.  His activities — good, bad or ugly — cannot remain unknown for a long time. Modi’s signature is not readable. Hence, it’s possible that he has a few things to hide.

Letters missing: According to graphology, if some of the letters are missing in a signature, it indicates that the person avoids any dialogue on a few matters relating to his life.

Secretive circle: Another thing that stands out in his signature is the big circle around the first letter of his name. It indicates that the writer wants to keep his true identity totally hidden. Writers with such circles  in their signatures ardently guard their secrets and it is very difficult to know the truth about them. Many questions about such writers’ lives are just matters of speculations. I would like to add here that I have not seen a signature like Modi’s.

Camouflaged first name: This reflects Modi’s tendency to be over-protective about himself. Circles around the first name shows the person gets very defensive in public. Such writers have a problem making friends because they do not open up and are always scared of getting hurt. They suspect the motives of people around them, which results in their social isolation. (Learn more about camouflaged signatures)

Two dots at the right end: The dots indicate that Modi likes to have the final word in whatever he does. The two dots also suggest that he does not like others’ intervention and keeps all suggestions at bay.

Now, there is one question in the minds of many of you. Does Modi’s handwriting sample corroborate his possible “involvement” in the Gujarat massacre? Honestly, I cannot confirm that. In fact, no graphologist can. Graphology, at best, can reveal whether someone has the potential to behave in a certain way. That’s what we did here. We unambiguously established that Modi certainly has something in his closet, which he won’t disclose. And that is not for me to investigate and find out. Do leave your comments in the space below. Should you want to add something to the article, you’re welcome!

© 2010 – 2011, Write Choice. All rights reserved.