In the past few years, very few Indian politicians have been trashed or have won accolades as much as Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi. Clearly, he is one of the most controversial persons in India. A lot has been written against Modi and his handling of the post-Godhra scenario. He has also been called the modern-day Hitler. But there is another side as well: it is also said there is no better performer than Narendra Modi in India’s political structure. In fact, Gujarat’s achievements in the past few years are often attributed to the efforts made by him.
Anyway, we are not here to decide whether we should side with someone who abuses him or those who heap praises on him, for that matter. We won’t conclude whether things that are said about him are true or not. Here, we will just analyse Modi’s signature. Here are a few points I have to share with you about his signature.

Illegible signature: If we do not have Narendra Modi’s full name written under his signature, is there any way we can figured out it is his handwriting sample? Nope. In graphology, such signatures are called illegible. A legible signature means the writer is interested in communicating; an illegible one means the opposite. In general, an illegible signature reveals a desire to be seen, but not known. Illegible handwriting, in combination with other specific traits, may usually indicate the writer’s dishonesty. However, there are a lot of variables.
Lack of readability: If all letters in a signature are readable, the writer’s feelings are readable. Even if a legible writer tries to dissemble his feelings, he usually faces failure. His activities — good, bad or ugly — cannot remain unknown for a long time. Modi’s signature is not readable. Hence, it’s possible that he has a few things to hide.
Article continues on next page
© 2010 – 2012, Write Choice. All rights reserved.
Pages: 1 2















